Am 13.12.2011 20:22, schrieb Sune Vuorela: > On 2011-12-13, Benoît Knecht <benoit.kne...@fsfe.org> wrote: >> Sebastian H. wrote: >>>> Why regroup qasmixer and qasconfig into one package? Wouldn't it be >>>> better having them Recommend each other? It doesn't seem like an >>>> improvement forcing users to install both tools instead of giving them >>>> the choice. But maybe I'm missing something. >>> >>> The short answer is, it makes package maintenance much easier and >>> is less error prone. >> >> I see the point of having one source package for all the tools, but you >> could still make several binary packages from there (as alsa-tools does, >> though not for every single utility I must admit). > > What's the size of these packages? what's their dependencies? > > A quick look from here looks like they are qtgui apps that uses > libasound ?
I've made a quick build. qastools-common_0.16.1-1_all.deb 23988 bytes qastools-qasconfig_0.16.1-1_amd64.deb 61768 bytes qastools-qashctl_0.16.1-1_amd64.deb 274986 bytes qastools-qasmixer_0.16.1-1_amd64.deb 309520 bytes versus qastools_0.16.1-1_amd64.deb 651262 bytes Dependencies for qastools-qasmixer (same for the other two apps). For qastools it's the same without qastools-common. libasound2 (>> 1.0.24.1), libc6 (>= 2.2.5), libgcc1 (>= 1:4.1.1), libqt4-network (>= 4:4.5.3), libqt4-svg (>= 4:4.5.3), libqtcore4 (>= 4:4.7.0~beta1), libqtgui4 (>= 4:4.6.2), libstdc++6 (>= 4.2.1), qastools-common Sebastian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4ee8abbe.10...@gmx.de
