>> It builds those binary packages: >> >> qastools-common - QasTools: Common files >> qastools-qasconfig - QasTools: ALSA configuration browser >> qastools-qashctl - QasTools: High level Control Interface ALSA mixer >> qastools-qasmixer - QasTools: ALSA mixer for the desktop > > I understand you want to replace the current qasconfig and qasmixer > package. So why do you give the new packages a different name? > (I also still don't think they need to be split in four binary packages.)
I don't have a strong opinion for the package names. They perfectly could keep their former names since the "qas" prefix already emphasizes that they are related. Though since they're already separated (qasmixer, qasconfig) I think it's reasonable to keep it that way. The new packages would be qastools-common and qashctl. The naming scheme then would look like this: qastools-common - QasTools common files qasconfig - ALSA configuration browser qashctl - High level Control Interface ALSA mixer qasmixer - ALSA mixer for the desktop Sebastian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4eea1901.5020...@gmx.de
