Stefan Tomanek wrote: > I'm not sure whether such a direct comparison of packages in their description > might be not be considered offensive to some and might incite some kind of > arms > race: "yo daemon so fat...". > Think of such comparisons in the description of gnome/kde or vim/emacs > packages :-)
That's why I'd be happy for you two to write them and not some zealots. Example: nvi Nvi is intended as a "bug-for-bug compatible" clone of the original BSD vi editor. As such, it doesn't have a lot of snazzy features as do some of the other vi clones such as elvis and vim. However, if all you want is vi, this is the one to get. See also [1]. The debian-l10n-english list can help with wording if you're having trouble being objective. :) Regards, Jonathan [1] http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/best-pkging-practices.html#bpp-pkg-desc -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101127235628.ga9...@burratino
