Dies schrieb Jonathan Nieder (jrnie...@gmail.com):
>
> This information could be useful for both package descriptions.
> (Maybe, for triggerhappy:
>
> That is, this is similar to esekeyd but it also supports
> <such and such>, allowing you to <such and such>.
>
> and for esekeyd:
>
> This package does not do <such and such>; for that, see
> triggerhappy. In the simple situations it does handle,
> esekeyd is {simpler to configure | compatible with the
> old funkey daemon | more conservative in its use of
> resources | providing a different interface that existing
> users might be used to | whatever}.
>
> ) As you can see, there are some placeholders because I do not know
> the packages; I am just saying it would be nice to provide the
> sysadmin with advice of some sort to choose between them.
I'm not sure whether such a direct comparison of packages in their description
might be not be considered offensive to some and might incite some kind of arms
race: "yo daemon so fat...".
Think of such comparisons in the description of gnome/kde or vim/emacs packages
:-)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101127152810.ga28...@zirkel.wertarbyte.de
