On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 8:18 PM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. <b...@iguanasuicide.net> wrote: > In <7337540c0905160100g59c1a3dem9f7622da6ca42...@mail.gmail.com>, Ludovico > Cavedon wrote: >>I think I'll go for >>2.2~rc3+hg365+dfsg1 > > Just, IMO: > I prefer 2.2~rc3+hg365~dfsg1 so that 2.2~rc3+hg365 would be greater than it. > In this way, it would allow distribution of the same upstream without > repacking for Debian by a non-Debian (or simply unofficial) group.
I think yours is a good point. However, as observed Magnus: > However, that won't work if you have already uploaded e.g. version 1.2-3 of a > package, and then somebody files a bug that the tarball contains some > non-free file, and you'd like to upload 1.2~dfsg-1 to fix it without waiting > for a new upstream release. Thanks. Ludovico -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
