On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 4:08 PM, Ludovico Cavedon <ludovico.cave...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Magnus Holmgren <holmg...@debian.org> wrote: >> On lördagen den 16 maj 2009, Felipe Sateler wrote: >>> When adding a dfsg or whatever suffix, always use ~ to avoid problems like >>> the one Jan pointed out. So your version would be 2.2~rc3~dfsg1, and then >>> you bump to 2.2~rc3+hg123~dfsg1. >> >> However, that won't work if you have already uploaded e.g. version 1.2-3 of a >> package, and then somebody files a bug that the tarball contains some >> non-free file, and you'd like to upload 1.2~dfsg-1 to fix it without waiting >> for a new upstream release. > > Yes, I agree with that (and also with > http://lintian.debian.org/tags/dfsg-version-with-period.html). dfsg it > is something that comes *after* the upstream release.
I mean: repackaging for dfsg compliance is something that comes after the upstream release, so "+dfsg1" is the right one. My problem is how to deal with "hg375" in combination with "+dfsg1". Thanks, Ludovivo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
