Hi, I could not find exactly how "-" and "." are ordered in package names. Are they equivalent, counting as non-digits?
My actual problem is: -current version of qutecom is "2.2~rc3.dfsg1" -as per lintian warning, the next version will be "+dfsg1" instead of ".dfsg1" -latest upstream version is still 2.2~rc3, but I would like to upload a more recent snapshot from upstream hg. What would be the correct packager version? - "2.2~rc3+hg365+dfsg1", being lucky that "+hg" comes after "+dfsg" - "2.2~rc3-hg365+dfsg1", but would have the "-" any drawback I do not see? Thanks, Ludovico -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
