On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 09:13:56PM +0100, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote: > Johannes Rohr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > [...] I am examining if it is possible to replace > > the installer package with a package that contains the actual > > software. So I'm not planning to make more non-free software available > > to Debian users, but simply to replace an existing package by > > something that is presumably easier to maintain and install. > > Since F-prot is already offering Debian packages of (as you stated) > inferior quality, have you offered building a new package for them > (for a small sum optionally)? They could put it in their download > section, and we could remove the installer with no harm done.
Well, I don't know. Until today I've contacted them three times and there as been no response except for an acknowledgement of receipt. Therefore I don't think they'd turn out to be more responsive if I came begging for money... Anyway, I have almost finished a revised installer package which (hopefully) makes installation and maintainance much more comfortable than before. When I'm done with that, I might consider building a proper Debian package that they can put on their web site. It seems to me that they just don't care at all about Debian. I really wonder _how_ they build their debs. I mean: A binary package which has a "Build-depends" field - wouldn't dpkg-buildpackage give an error message on this? Thanks, Johannes
pgpNmlGTbrGRr.pgp
Description: PGP signature
