On Fri, 2024-07-05 at 10:05 +0100, Phil Wyett wrote: <snip> > > > > 3. Licenses: Issue > > > > philwyett@ks-windu:~/Development/builder/debian/mentoring/mangl-1.1.5$ lrc > > en: Versions: recon 1.11 check 3.3.9-1 > > > > Parsing Source Tree .... > > Reading copyright .... > > Running licensecheck .... > > > > d/copyright | licensecheck > > > > ISC | BSD-3-clause mandoc/compat_err.c > > ISC | BSD-3-clause mandoc/compat_fts.c > > ISC | BSD-3-clause mandoc/compat_fts.h > > ISC | BSD-3-clause mandoc/compat_getsubopt.c > > ISC | BSD-3-clause mandoc/compat_strcasestr.c > > BSD-2-Clause-NetBSD| BSD-2-Clause-NetBSD and/or BSD-2-clause > > mandoc/compat_stringlist.c > > BSD-2-Clause-NetBSD| BSD-2-Clause-NetBSD and/or BSD-2-clause > > mandoc/compat_stringlist.h > > ISC | BSD-3-clause mandoc/compat_strsep.c > > ISC | BSD-3-clause mandoc/man.1 > > Unlicense | Expat and/or Unlicense stretchy_buffer.h > > > > The one I am curious about is the ISC. Looking at the files and other > > packages that have this "The > > Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved." these tend > > to fall under a BSD > > license. I would be happy for Andrey or another DD to offer advice here, as > > they know more than I. > > > >
<snip> Hi James, For files that are University of California. Possibly more appropriate is: https://spdx.org/licenses/BSD-4-Clause-UC.html Regards Phil -- Internet Relay Chat (IRC): kathenas Website: https://kathenas.org Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg/ Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
