Dear All, On 03/15/2017 02:48 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Zoltan, > > On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 01:32:36PM +0100, Zoltan Gyarmati wrote: >> Please see my comments inline, > Sure. What else. :-P > >> Yes, i would be happy to push my listed git repos to a team VCS, and >> thank you for the >> offering the sponsoration although before we go any further (mainly to >> avoid any duplicated effort) >> i want to see what would be the way we cooperate on this with Aaron and >> the pkg-electronics team. >> As i'm rather new in contributing to Debian itself, i'm a bit lost here >> how to proceed with this, >> so maybe you and/or Dima and/or Bdale could figure out how to do this. > Some teams have developed a team policy that helps newcomers. I'm not > sure about the pkg-electronics team but reading the Debian Science > policy[3] could give some helpful hints that might be true for other > teams as well. (Actually the Debian Science policy os not really well > maintained, Debian Med one is better and Debian GIS and Debian Astro are > more current an possibly better structured. Just do a web search and > read what you consider the most readable one. Its an open task to merge > those documents and just maintain group specific issues separately but > nobody has taken over this task so far.) > >>> New packages can easily go to unstable. They will not migrate to testing >>> anyway. >> These are not new packages, they have been RFA-d by Uwe (the current >> maintainer) >> a month back see [1]. > Ahhh, OK, thank experimental is correct - sorry for the noise. > >>>> It seems we nicely teamed up to maintain this, >>>> how should we proceed, should be check the corresponding >>>> RFAs to ITA? >>> Hmmm, I admit I do not understand this question. >> As these packages are requested for adoption again, see [1] according >> to my understanding on >> the debian mentors docs (see for example [2]) i (or my mentor/sponsor?) >> have to set it to ITA. > Yes, please set it to ITA:
OK, thx. @Aaron, as you were/are also working on this, do you have any objection if i set these RFA bugs to ITA for myself and start the sponsoring/reviewing process of the uploaded packages [1] with Andreas and anybody else who is interested? Any comment from the electronics-devel side? Thanks for the help, regards, Zoltan Gyarmati https://zgyarmati.de [1] https://mentors.debian.net/package/sigrok-firmware-fx2lafw https://mentors.debian.net/package/pulseview https://mentors.debian.net/package/libsigrok https://mentors.debian.net/package/sigrok-cli https://mentors.debian.net/package/sigrok https://mentors.debian.net/package/libserialport
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
