Hi Étienne, > Nilesh Patra, on 2024-07-18: > > On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 05:29:55PM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 01:21:15PM +0200, Steffen Möller wrote: > > > > I addressed the lintian errors/warnings and introduced d/u/edam besides > > > > updating d/u/metadata. > > I proceeded to the sponsored upload minutes ago. > Thank you for the version bump to the newer major version!
Thank you for your review and upload. I still have to check if it has truly arrived :-) but PyMol 3 meant to have adopted the generation of structural representations of DNA sequences, a shift over from their commercial branch https://github.com/schrodinger/pymol-open-source/issues/351 > > > > Did not find anything to contribute to the problem of the > > > > reproducibility test but did not want to just disable it either. IMHO > > > > we should just raise an issue with upstream and let them fix that :) > > > > Sadly, reprotest is not indicating the exact files that are > > > > contributing to the difference, I only know it is in the python3-pymol > > > > package. Hm. > > > > > > Maybe this helps you: > > > > > > $ debdiff > > > control/source-root/pymol-data_3.0.0+dfsg-1+salsaci+20240718+11_all.deb > > > experiment-1/source-root/pymol_3.0.0+dfsg-1+salsaci+20240718+11_all.deb > > > > Minutes after sending this I realised I compared the wrong files in a hurry. > > Oops :/ > > > > I tried to diff again and everything is identical. Only diff is in dbgsym. > > Seems like some embedded buildpath issue. Good idea. Best, Steffen
