Hi Steffen, Nilesh Patra, on 2024-07-18: > On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 05:29:55PM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 01:21:15PM +0200, Steffen Möller wrote: > > > I addressed the lintian errors/warnings and introduced d/u/edam besides > > > updating d/u/metadata.
I proceeded to the sponsored upload minutes ago. Thank you for the version bump to the newer major version! > > > Did not find anything to contribute to the problem of the reproducibility > > > test but did not want to just disable it either. IMHO we should just > > > raise an issue with upstream and let them fix that :) Sadly, reprotest is > > > not indicating the exact files that are contributing to the difference, I > > > only know it is in the python3-pymol package. Hm. > > > > Maybe this helps you: > > > > $ debdiff > > control/source-root/pymol-data_3.0.0+dfsg-1+salsaci+20240718+11_all.deb > > experiment-1/source-root/pymol_3.0.0+dfsg-1+salsaci+20240718+11_all.deb > > Minutes after sending this I realised I compared the wrong files in a hurry. > Oops :/ > > I tried to diff again and everything is identical. Only diff is in dbgsym. > Seems like some embedded buildpath issue. If people want to tackle build reproducibility issues, the pymol repository on salsa is up to date, accounting for today's upload. Have a nice day, :) -- .''`. Étienne Mollier <emoll...@debian.org> : :' : pgp: 8f91 b227 c7d6 f2b1 948c 8236 793c f67e 8f0d 11da `. `' sent from /dev/pts/3, please excuse my verbosity `- on air: New Machine - New Horizon
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
