Le Sat, Nov 09, 2013 at 10:30:04AM +0100, Andreas Tille a écrit : > On Sat, Nov 09, 2013 at 04:42:47PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > > > Note that it does not contain the ‘pristine-tar’ and > > ‘upstream’ branches, which are not particularly useful anymore. > > In any case you should add the needed workflow / tips how to deal > with this. I somehow wonder in how far two different people should > create an md5sum identical orig.tar. Seems with this workflow it > is not possible without using `apt-get source`.
Indeed, one would need to download it using apt-get source, or from the upstream system for browsing Git repositories (here, GitHub). Pristine-tar brought us as much pain as gain, so I am tempted to go without. Nevertheless, it is totally conceivable to maintain a pristine-tar branch (perhaps without git-buildpackage). In the absence of a upstream source archive, it is possible to run dpkg-buildpakcage anyway, either without building the source package or using a native format. This is why in the case of fastx-toolkit and libgtextutils I have reverted the source format to 1.0, which is more flexible here. > > Currently, the package fails to build: changes upstream now let the > > hardening > > flags be passed to the compiler, which triggers fatal errors. I reported > > the > > issue at the following URL. I am sure that patches are very welcome. > > > > https://github.com/agordon/fastx_toolkit/issues/1 > > https://github.com/agordon/libgtextutils/issues/1 > > I might give it a try if the repository is in alioth and I can commit. This is now fixed upstream, thanks. I will replace the repositories on Alioth once a revision is tagged upstream. Cheers, -- Charles Plessy Debian Med packaging team, http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
