Hi,
the reasons to drop ctn (besides #724935 we have #714758 blocking some
transition) are bcoming stronger and stronger. Any volunteer to give it
some chance and sorting out these issues or is it time for a ROM bug to
ftpmaster and let it RIP.
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 07:22:55PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 12:04:09PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 9:04 AM, Andreas Tille <andr...@an3as.eu> wrote:
> > > I remember that I had a hard time when I updated ctn the last time which
> > > was five years ago. Upstream did not even issued a new version since
> > > ten years. So I wonder what you might think about ctn: Should I simply
> > > update the package to todays Debian standards of packaging or is this
> > > rather a waste of time and we have better software to deal with the
> > > tasks that could be done with ctn?
> >
> > I think we should move on to mirctn:
> >
> > https://sourceforge.net/projects/mirctn/files/mirctn/
> >
> > AFAIK ctn from debian and mirctn are compatible, mainly thanks to:
> >
> > http://patch-tracker.debian.org/patch/series/view/ctn/3.0.6-13/20_mysql_4.2.patch
> >
> > CTN may not be as active as dcmtk, but still being used AFAIK.
>
> Any volunteer for this? Specifically since #724935 ctn is in danger to
> be removed and I somehow do not feel my time spent very well to sort out
> issues like this on unmaintained software like ctn.
>
> Kind regards
>
> Andreas.
>
> --
> http://fam-tille.de
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
> Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20131011172255.ge1...@an3as.eu
>
>
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20131104203156.gm23...@an3as.eu
