Hi,
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 12:04:09PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 9:04 AM, Andreas Tille <andr...@an3as.eu> wrote:
> > I remember that I had a hard time when I updated ctn the last time which
> > was five years ago. Upstream did not even issued a new version since
> > ten years. So I wonder what you might think about ctn: Should I simply
> > update the package to todays Debian standards of packaging or is this
> > rather a waste of time and we have better software to deal with the
> > tasks that could be done with ctn?
>
> I think we should move on to mirctn:
>
> https://sourceforge.net/projects/mirctn/files/mirctn/
>
> AFAIK ctn from debian and mirctn are compatible, mainly thanks to:
>
> http://patch-tracker.debian.org/patch/series/view/ctn/3.0.6-13/20_mysql_4.2.patch
>
> CTN may not be as active as dcmtk, but still being used AFAIK.
Any volunteer for this? Specifically since #724935 ctn is in danger to
be removed and I somehow do not feel my time spent very well to sort out
issues like this on unmaintained software like ctn.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20131011172255.ge1...@an3as.eu
