Le mardi 1 octobre 2024, 17:02:40 UTC Sylvain Beucler a écrit :
> Hello Mike,
> 
> On 12/08/2024 18:40, Santiago Ruano Rincón wrote:
> > El 12/08/24 a las 00:27, Mike Gabriel escribió:
> >> On  So 11 Aug 2024 12:57:23 CEST, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> >>> On Sat, Aug 10, 2024 at 11:19:24AM -0300, Santiago Ruano Rincón wrote:
> >>>> El 31/05/22 a las 05:42, Mike Gabriel escribió:
> >>>>> On  Mo 30 Mai 2022 20:04:14 CEST, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> >>>>>> Am Sun, May 29, 2022 at 09:36:43AM +0200 schrieb Salvatore Bonaccorso:
> >>>>>>> While this is discouraged in general, we could opt here for this, to
> >>>>>>> avoid that ckeditor3 might get additional users outside of
> >>>>>>> php-horde-editor.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> This would also mean that only those bits of ckeditor3 which are
> >>>> actually
> >>>>>> used by Horde need to be updated.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I read that embedding is ok with the security team for the
> >>>> exceptional case
> >>>>> php-horde-editor. I will put this on my todo list for the next
> >>>> Horde update
> >>>>> round (which is already overdue).
> >>>>
> >>>> AFAICS on tracker.d.o, php-horde-editor hasn't been updated since then,
> >>>> so I guess the situation is the same than when buster was becoming LTS.
> >>>>
> >>>> I wonder if there is any action that could be made for bullseye and
> >>>> bookworm. Is there a way to limit the ckeditor3 security support to
> >>>> only cover the usage with php-horde-editor?
> >>>
> >>> Horde is pretty much unmaintained. php-horde-mime-viewer and 
> >>> php-horde-turba
> >>> are in dsa-needed.txt for a long time, but pings were never replied to
> >>> either.
> >>>
> >>> It seems best to drop Horde (and ckeditor3 alongside) from testing.
> >>
> >> I will take a look at this the coming week or the week after (when I will
> >> have plenty of time for Debian stuff).
> >>
> >> For ckeditor3, I will drop the symlinking of ckeditor3 and use the bundled
> >> version instead (which currently gets removed). I will also check the diff
> >> between Horde's bundled version of ckeditor3 and the version we have in
> >> Debian and amend things if needed.
> >>
> >> Regarding the nearly-non-maintenance state of Horde: Horde hasn't been
> >> ported to PHP 8, yet. One of the upstream devs is working on that, but 
> >> there
> >> are not official releases, yet. I will ping them about the current status.
> > 
> > OK, that is for debian testing, right? Mike, any thought about bullseye?
> > I am finding hard to find arguments to keep it supported, but I would
> > like to hear from you (or from somebody else in the LTS Team) :-) ?
> > 
> > Mike, could you please save me some time and point me to the bundled
> > version of ckeditor3?
> 
> Mike,
> 
> Has there been news on horde* and ckeditor3? :)
I can I think update the ckeditor to 4

But I need someone to test my change(I am not fluent in horde)

Bastien
> 
> If not I believe it's best we drop support for these packages in bullseye.
> 
> Cheers!
> Sylvain Beucler
> Debian LTS Team
> (Front-Desk this week)
> 
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply via email to