On 07/05/2017 07:00 AM, Michael . wrote: > Thomas it is all fine and good to say "(lets not go into details why > this happened)" but the details support the reality of the situation. > Please read (https://lists.debian.org/debian-live/2015/11/msg00008.html) > and see where Iain says > >>>It is worth noting that live-build is not a Debian project, it is an > external project that claims to be an official Debian project. This is > something that needs to be fixed. > > My understanding come from the people who initiated the take over of > building live images. If I am wrong then so was Iain and you should have > been a part of the discussion back in November 2015 to clear it all up > for us. > > I want Live-Wrapper to succeed (only because it is the official Debian > Live system) and I support it through testing it and reporting on things > I have found which would limit the audience who could use it but I also > want Live-Build to continue (because Live-Build is more suitable for a > roll your own images that derivatives would create). > > I must admit I am concerned about this reluctance "to go into details". > This type of thing keeps people in the dark and that is something I do > not support. There is no need to go over all the details but at least > provide proof as I have done. > > On 5 July 2017 at 08:34, Thomas Goirand <tho...@goirand.fr > <mailto:tho...@goirand.fr>> wrote: > > On 06/27/2017 11:53 PM, Michael . wrote: > > Charles, let me clear up a couple of misconceptions for you. Debian Live > > (made with Live Wrapper) is an official Debian project. Live Build (the > > old Debian Live) apparently wasn't official but was recognised by Debian > > for its official images. Live Build is now officially part of Debian > > Hum... You also have some misunderstanding here. Live-build has been > packaged in Debian, and fully part of Debian for *years* (well before > Raphael worked on it). > > What changed is that, since Daniel Baumann doesn't build the live images > anymore (let's not go into details why this happened), Steve does it at > the same time as other Debian images. It's now included in a single > process of building images. > > Cheers, > > Thomas Goirand (zigo)
Please don't top-post. No need to rehash. What you wrote was that live-build wasn't part of Debian, which was wrong. That's different from the produced live images (what you wrote above is right). In other words: live-build != live images. Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo)
