Hi, Daniel Baumann wrote (25 Jan 2010 19:19:12 GMT) :
> Philippe Lelédy wrote: >> 2) persistent=home to bypass global persistence. > persistency needs to be redone, this is one of the reasons to do > exactely. had that already in mind :) Are there any plans for the persistency redo? We have plans [1] to implement some bits of persistency in T(A)ILS [2], and wonder if it is worth basing new work on live-initramfs 1.x persistency features (e.g. home-sn). [1] http://amnesia.boum.org/todo/persistence/ [2] http://amnesia.boum.org/ Bye, -- intrigeri <intrig...@boum.org> | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr-fingerprint.asc | The impossible just takes a bit longer. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-live-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/85y6fr8qli....@boum.org
