The *signed* DCO is useful. The *unsigned* DCO is not, it's mostly there for future contributors.
On Fri, Nov 29, 2024, 14:11 Soren Stoutner <so...@debian.org> wrote: > On Friday, November 29, 2024 12:03:34 PM MST Daniel Hakimi wrote: > > I don't think the unsigned DCO really supports the chain of custody/title > > all that much, but it may still put minds at ease that the project is > > following best practices regarding IP. > > You can certainly make an argument that the DCO isn’t *effective* at > supporting > the chain of custody of the end-user licensing of the code, but I think > that > without question that is what the *intention* of the DCO is. > > https://wiki.linuxfoundation.org/dco > > -- > Soren Stoutner > so...@debian.org
