>>>>> On Wed, 27 Nov 2024, Soren Stoutner wrote: > On Wednesday, November 27, 2024 2:48:51 AM MST Simon Josefsson wrote: >> I don't follow. Do you believe the DCO is a license text?
> Yes. There is no question that the DCO is a license. It says right > in the text it is a license. So if someone wants to include any non-free file in a package, they can just claim in its header that it is a license, and it will be excepted from the DFSG? That seems like a strange concept.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
