Olive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > There are known example of things that are indeed DFSG-free
By what criterion do you decide that something is "indeed DFSG-free"? If such a criterion existed, I'm sure we'd love to know about it. It would make our lives on this list much simpler. > but were declared non-free by "consensus" on debian legal (the GFDL > without non modifiable section is an example). Again, note that a GR vote only decides *what the Debian project will or will not do*. Such a vote cannot declare a work DFSG-free; that is a property of the work and its license terms, unaffected by the result of a vote. -- \ "I was gratified to be able to answer promptly and I did. I | `\ said I didn't know." -- Mark Twain, _Life on the Mississippi_ | _o__) | Ben Finney -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]