Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >There seem to be consensus that as long as there is no vote on [CC > >by-sa 3.0], it's probably non-free, and best not put it in > >main. Correct?
> Wrong. CC-BY-SA 3.0 is a free license and many works licensed this > way are in main. Note that the latter does not necessarily imply the former. Many packages have been in main against the advice of a consensus view on debian-legal that the package is non-free. -- \ "To be is to do" —Plato | `\ "To do is to be" —Aristotle | _o__) "Do be do be do" —Sinatra | Ben Finney -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
