* James Westby: > ; This file is part of the Metasploit Exploit Framework > ; and is subject to the same licenses and copyrights as > ; the rest of this package.
This should be fine; a lot of Perl modules use similar language. > There is a zlib implementation with the following license This is the original zlib license. > b. The Software is distributed without any charge, beyond (at > Your option) the reasonable costs of data transfer or storage media. You > may -not- (i) sell, lease, rent, or otherwise charge for the Software, > (ii) include any component or subset of the Software in any commercial > application or product, or (iii) sell, lease, rent, or otherwise charge > for any appliance (i.e., hardware, peripheral, personal digital device, > or other electronic product) that includes any component or subset of > the Software. This doesn't look DFSG-free to me. Most of the other, rather innovative clauses, have problems as well. If the click-through part must be enforced by redistributors, it's not even suitable for the non-free section. I can understand why upstream is doing this, but I don't think the result is still free software. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
