"ext George Danchev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Perhaps the usage is small enough that the code is not really a derivative >> work of RFC3174. If you're lucky. If not, there's probably an alternate >> SHA1 implementation somewhere which doesn't use the RFC sample code, which >> could be substituted; the actual cipher almost certainly qualifies as an >> uncopyrightable "fact". >> ----
>Aha, these are the files: >libsofia-sip-ua/ipt/sofia-sip/sha1.h >libsofia-sip-ua/ipt/sha1.c Hmhh. We do not use them much within library, we could distribute them separately for applications. I'll have to have peek around for the code... >> All the other licenses are fine. >Good. >> Joe Smith noted two without an explicit right to sell, but the IBM one >> grants the right to "use in any way he or she deems fit", which I think is >> pretty definite permission. >> The other says "unrestricted use", which *probably* implies the right >> to sell; I would contact Pekka Pessi and ask if that includes the right to >> sell. If he says "yes", then I'd say it's fine. "Yes." >This applies to libsofia-sip-ua/ipt/rc4.c, and >libsofia-sip-ua/su/getopt.c was incorrectly mentioned in the >COPYRIGHTS, since it does not exist. It looks to me that getopt.c is still there? --Pekka -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
