It's curious why sun thinks htye need FAR?DFAR clauses. They have added similar language in the CDDL License. http://www.opensource.org/licenses/cddl1.php By the way; the OSI has approved the CDDL as being complaint with thier guidelines, which I beleive are similar to DFSG, so inclusion of the FAR/DFAR clause doesn't seem to be a problem.
In I as a goverment contractor provide software without proper 'markings/legends', such as the paragraph in discussion, then its possible we run into issue where the Gov can claim unlimted rights. But as someone noted above, that can't count if I pass along someone elses software, if they haven't put the right marks/legend, I can't put them in jeopardy. So perhaps Sun just wants to CYA or thier free licenses got written by someone from thier commercial world :) -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Sofia-SIP-COPYRIGHTS-tf1793900.html#a5192947 Sent from the Debian Legal forum at Nabble.com. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
