Thanks for some insights between OSI and DFSG I certianly didn't mean to imply that DFSG would accept just because OSI did. >From a process and end-goal perspective they appear to be different
Though from a legal perspective I respect rossen (who has left OSI) and assume his evaluation that the DFA/FAR clause in question did not violate the guidelines/definition for the OSSI and it appears the APPL (Apple) licenses would be a pretty good indicator, but as you say nothing more then an indicator Curious quesiton, is there any OSI approved license that DFSG has rejected/disapproved as not compliant with the guidelines? (Setting aside nonGPL compliant licenses and GPL compliancy issues of course) -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Sofia-SIP-COPYRIGHTS-tf1793900.html#a5198019 Sent from the Debian Legal forum at Nabble.com. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
