Charles Fry wrote: > The one big thing that everyone in this thread has missed is that we are > trying to establish the utility of this licence to software explicitely > distributed by the PHP Group at php.net in Pear or Pecl.
Is all that software also written/copyrighted by the PHP Group? Also, what happens if someone wants to take a package and distribute it, individually, to someone else? He needs a license for that. And if that license says: > > > 6. Redistributions of any form whatsoever must retain the following > > > acknowledgment: > > > "This product includes PHP software, freely available from > > > <http://www.php.net/software/>". then he's forced to lie if he just distributes the one package. Arnoud -- Arnoud Engelfriet, Dutch & European patent attorney - Speaking only for myself Patents, copyright and IPR explained for techies: http://www.iusmentis.com/
