On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 10:39:05PM +0100, Alexander Terekhov wrote: > On 11/25/05, Glenn Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [...] > > "PHP scripts are derivative works of PHP" sounds like someone misinterpreted > > the FSF's claims, and ended up believing that the source of a program is a > > derivative work of its libraries. (That, unlike the FSF's claims, seems > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > Unlike? > > http://web.novalis.org/talks/compliance-for-developers/slide-49.html > > "Still a derivative work: > > * Distributing the source code of software which links to a library" > > -- Copyright (c) 2004, Free Software Foundation.
I can't find anything in those slides which provides a basis for that claim, and the technical issues surrounding such a claim are very complex. I'd be interested to see a video or something of a talk associated with these slides, to see if there's any additional context which the speaker provides to back up this claim. As it stands, this looks like a line the author pickup around the office koolaid-cooler. - Matt
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
