Florian Weimer writes: > * Michael Poole: > > [something close to the anti-patent clause from the MPL] > > > Some people believe that this kind of termination clause violates the > > DFSG. > > But this is not specific to the AROS License, it's inherited from the > MPL (although I haven't compared the licenses word-for-word).
I did not compare it word-for-word either. I have said before that I think that termination clause (as opposed to the second one) is a reasonable mechanism for dealing with software patents; I mentioned it only to save the trouble of someone else pointing it out separately. Michael Poole
