Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That is indeed an issue. > Is source still source when it grows beyond the imaginable? > But that issue is not GPL-specific, IMHO. > Are you really providing the freedoms that we value, without providing > the preferred form for modification?
I think that we are providing the freedoms that we value if we provide a practical form for modification. The DFSG exist because we want to ensure that certain acts are possible. "Source" that allows those acts should be adequate, even if there potentially exists some "better" version of that source. -- Matthew Garrett | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
