Ingo Ruhnke wrote: > I don't think so, undocumented source there is still a good chance to > make modification, sure it might be more difficult, but I still have > everything that I need to produce the binary. With the image however I > only have the 'binary', I don't have any 'source' information that > would allow me to modify the resulting work in any meaningfull way. I > consider this more similar to somebody who is writing a programm in C, > then compiling it and then losing the source code (diskcrash, rm, > whatever). To my understanding the resulting binary is undistributable > under the GPL. My understanding is that it is; there are some cases where people really do hack up binaries in hex editors routinely. Although probably someone would disassemble it, and then *that* would be the preferred form for modification.
-- This space intentionally left blank.
