On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 08:33:13AM -0400, Walter Landry wrote: > I am hardly the first person to bring this up [1] [2]. This comment > from Raul Miller is particularly illuminating [3] > > As I remember it, DFSG#10 was specifically added to the DFSG because > some people were saying that there were strict interpretations of > the DFSG which could cause the GPL to fail, while others (including > the author) were dismissing this as stupid. [In part, because they > are "guidelines".] > > Raul provided further details later [4].
I'd prefer you emphasized the further details with only a tangential reference to my memory. ;) > [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2003/10/msg00251.html > [2] http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/05/msg00558.html and followups > [3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/05/msg00920.html > [4] http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/05/msg00946.html Thanks, -- Raul
