Richard Braakman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 02:09:52PM -0400, Brian Thomas Sniffen wrote: >> There were demands that I point at the DFSG, and I did so. Now you >> want a practical example. Here's some attempts at one: > [...] >> * I can't fork the code, even distributing as patches. There's no way >> for me to make XEmacs, which is FSF Emacs + code by people who won't >> transfer copyright to the FSF. > > This part I find particularly interesting, because I see the freedom > to fork as fundamental. I don't understand your reasoning, though. > Can you explain what would go wrong if I tried to create an XOcaml?
INRIA downloads it and incorporates the neat features into the proprietary version, which they sell to others. > (Note that the source+patches problem itself is addressed by DFSG#4, > though obviously not in the way I would like.) > > Richard Braakman -- Brian Sniffen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
