Ok, let's rename this thread so people can see it. Friendly,
Sven Luther On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 01:32:08AM +0200, Sylvain LE GALL wrote: > On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 10:26:42AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 02:05:28AM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 05:39:06PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: > > > > Sven Luther wrote: > > > > Bah, i still don't believe that these two clause are really non-free. They > > may > > be a bother and everything, but not non-free accordying to the DFSG. > > > > Now, if you feel like solving problems in 5 minutes, could you please have a > > look at the unicode.data problem, which Sylvain Legal asked about here over > > 6 > > month ago, and which didn't find an appropriate solution and has been in > > limbo > > since then, even though it seems many other packages carry it already in > > main. > > > > Sylvain, could you quickly recapitulate the issue, so Andrew can help > > solving > > it as he so nicely volunteered to do in 5 minutes ? > > > > Hello, > > Well, this problem has nothing to do with ocaml... But i can set this > problem once again : > - i have library which contains UnicodeData.txt > - copyright of upstream and package contains references to UCD ( you can > find this licence here : http://www.unicode.org/copyright.html ) > - the files UnicodeData.txt is only shipped in the source ( there is a > program to transform into ocaml readable file ) > - after having read -legal archive, and submitted my problem > http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/01/msg00022.html, i am still > waiting for a solution > > To sum up, you told every one to wait for a release of a new miscfiles > containing up to date UnicodeData.txt. The latest release date from > October 2002. > > I contact maintainer/upstream author who told me he was no more in > charge of this package... > > Now, i am waiting for a solution... > > Since, i begin to really need the package i am working on, it would be > really nice to be able to upload the package in his native form ( ie > without doing nasty replacement with files from other package ). > > Is the current licence of this data, should be enough DFSG free to allow > a distribution in main ? > > Kind regard > Sylvain Le Gall > > ps : my question is a trap : python, perl et al already shipped the file > ( i don't know for whom is it a trap : perl maintainer or -legal... good > luck perl maintainer ) > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
