[MFT to d-legal, don't know what d-devel has to do with this] On Sat, Jul 24, 2004 at 09:13:08PM +1000, Parsons, Drew wrote: > I notice our free-software page, the one that points to the DSFG text > (http://www.debian.org/intro/free), refers to a couple of sample free > licenses (GPL, BSD et al). > > I think it would be a useful resource if this page would also refer to > examples of licenses that Debian considers DSFG-nonfree (e.g. GFSDL, XFree86 > 1.1, etc), with a brief summary of why they do not meet our guidelines.
This already exists: http://www.debian.org/legal/licenses/ I didn't annouced or linked this very "visible" yet as there are ongoing discussions on d-legal how to do this right. If you want, I can dig in the list's archives for some pointers. [...] > DISCLAIMER: The information in this message is confidential and may be > legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this > message by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended > recipient, any disclosure, copying, or distribution of the message, or any > action or omission taken by you in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be > unlawful. Please immediately contact the sender if you have received this > message in error. Thank you. Always entertaining to read this on a Debian mailing list *g* Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www: http://www.djpig.de/
