On Sat, Jul 24, 2004 at 09:13:08PM +1000, Parsons, Drew wrote: > My motivation for asking for this is that my Xprint upstream author prefers > ksh93 to bash, and would prefer it if we were to use it. Looking into > ksh93, AT&T has now released it as open-source, but the licence > (http://www.research.att.com/sw/license/ast-open.html) has enough if's and > but's that it is not obvious to me whether or not it is DSFG-free.
I stopped reading right after 1e.
