Brian Thomas Sniffen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>If those were the only options, it was the loose consensus that that would >>>not be free. >> >> Really? Wow. That's insane. > >Merely internally consistent. A requirement that I can only >distribute by offering to distribute to any third party is not Free. > >Practically speaking, imagine what happens when every microsoft >employee separately requests a copy of GNU Emacs, on tape please.
You're free to charge the costs incurred. It's not clear to me that GPL 3b allows the recipient to specify the preferred medium. -- Matthew Garrett | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
