Walter Landry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> You could look at it that way. On the other hand, if I release my >> GPLed code under 3(b) then anyone who receives it can pass on the offer >> I gave them (under 3(c)). I am then obliged to pass on my modifications >> directly to people who I never provided binaries to. Is distribution >> under 3(b) and 3(c) non-free? > >If that were the only way to distribute the code, then yes, that would >be non-free. Fortunately, we have 3(a).
In the absence of 3(a), the GPL would be non-free? Has this been discussed here before? -- Matthew Garrett | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
