Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Matthew Garrett wrote: >> You could look at it that way. On the other hand, if I release my >> GPLed code under 3(b) then anyone who receives it can pass on the offer >> I gave them (under 3(c)). I am then obliged to pass on my modifications >> directly to people who I never provided binaries to. Is distribution >> under 3(b) and 3(c) non-free? > >If those were the only options, it was the loose consensus that that would >not be free.
Really? Wow. That's insane. -- Matthew Garrett | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
