> > [A] These would have to be factual inaccuracies in a secondary section > > (which rather limits the scope of any such inaccuracy).
On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 08:13:05AM +0100, Henning Makholm wrote: > It could also be Cover Texts. The documentation currently distributed > by the FSF require the cover text "a GNU manual" and a notice that > implies that the FSF sells copies of the text. Both of these turn into > factual inaccuracies if I modify the manual to become documentation of > the BSD implementation of the tool in question. I agree that this is bulky and akward. I don't agree that this requires any factual inaccuracy. You can create a derived copy of the work which eliminates the content you don't want, and wrap the remainder in the required cover and include that as a chapter or appendix in some other manual. Note that content under a "patches only" license will give you much worse problems when incorporating it (perhaps as examples, or perhaps pulling documentation from a help menu item) into other documentation. -- Raul
