Don Armstrong wrote: <snip> > I'm not sure if it's been raised in the context of the DFSG, but as > some people have been mixing and matching GFDLed works with GPLed > works, or seem to want to, this was something that came up in > discussion. Since many of the affected GFDL works are documentation for GPLed programs, it came up as something people actually wanted to do, a lot.
Last time I checked, nobody but the FSF could legally make modified versions of the libstdc++-v3 manual, because it combined doxygen-generated material from GPL source files with GFDL material. -- There are none so blind as those who will not see.
