On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 04:42:53PM -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote: > >> No. Cover texts has to go on the cover. > > > > Of the GFDL licensed component, not on the work as a whole. > > Ummm, what? Have you read the first sentence of GFDL 3?
Have you read the first paragraph of section 1? If so, what makes you think that chapters of a BSD manual which incorporates a chapter from a GFDL book must all be licensed under the GFDL? > > And, as I said in the message you were responding to, while the GFDL > > approach is unwieldy, it's less so than a "patches only" license could > > be. > > Huh? A free patches-only license allows the results of compiling > patched source code to be distributed. And how does this help when what you want to distribute from that program isn't a binary? -- Raul
