On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 05:47:26PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 02:04:42AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > A difference in optimization is not relevant to a package's freedom. > > If compiling the program with a non-free compiler gains you users who would > not find the package usable otherwise, distributing binaries built with > such a compiler induces your users to be dependant (indirectly) on non-free > software. That is a freedom issue.
Okay, that is a fair point. I'll leave it at that.
--
EARTH
smog | bricks
AIR -- mud -- FIRE
soda water | tequila
WATER
-- with thanks to fortune
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
