Brian Thomas Sniffen wrote: > Josh Triplett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>The issue is that the top-level name of a project is relatively easy to >>change, while needing to provide a replacement for possibly dozens or >>hundreds of images *funtionally used* by the software is a significant >>barrier to modification. > > No it's not. Go ahead and try to change all the instances of Mozilla > in Mozilla. Observe that several of them are not plain text, but > image files containing clever renderings of the text "Mozilla". You > get the image-changing problem anyway, because people can draw > pictures of text.
When did I say I thought it acceptable that you would need to change every single occurance of the word "Mozilla" when making a modified version? :) I said "top-level name", and I meant exactly that. To the extent names have been incorporated into functional parts of the work, *which includes a requirement to change an image, as well as doing a global s/Mozilla/other/g*, I do not consider it Free to require them to be changed, and I do not believe it is covered under DFSG4. We have covered similar requirements in other licenses as well: there was a license that made the requirement that on request, you must purge the name of the author entirely from the work. I think that was from one of the Creative Commons licenses. That requirement was considered non-free as well. (Personally, this argument is further strengthening my opinion that DFSG4 has little redeeming value, and that we would be better served by striking it entirely; there are many who share this opinion, and many who have expressed it on this list. In addition to the earlier problems that have been noted, it is apparently also confusing and ambiguous to some.) - Josh Triplett
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
