On Sun, Oct 10, 2004 at 03:51:11PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: > I strongly disagree with that, as I do with anything other than a set of > words being called a name.
Why should this be an issue? It's clear that trademarks serve an identification role. We interpret the DFSG according to its spirit, rather than trying to interpret it as some kind of legal document, Anyways, it's my understanding that someone in the U.S. had his name legally changed to this, at one point: http://www.extractando.com/entretenimiento/image/PrinceSymbol.jpg But why should that even be an issue? Thanks, -- Raul
