Brian Thomas Sniffen wrote: > Josh Triplett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>>The trademark rights are entirely separate, and there's no reason for >>>Debian to license them in any way other than "Free for use if there's >>>no confusion with Debian, either because they refer to Debian or >>>because they're in a domain where Debian does no business." >> >>If you believe that to be the case, then I assume you would argue that >>we should not include any of the Debian logos within the Debian main >>distribution. That would be unfortunate. Or are you arguing that such >>a restriction would be DFSG-free? It seems to blatantly fail DFSG6. > > It doesn't fail DFSG 6 because it is explicitly protected by DFSG 4: > the logo is a name.
I strongly disagree with that, as I do with anything other than a set of words being called a name. - Josh Triplett
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
