On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 07:43:01PM -0500, Brian T. Sniffen wrote: > There is also no way to be sure that the next minor upstream Emacs > release will still be entirely free software, and Debian has been > bitten by this before. So why not move everything to non-free which > is not under a "GPL, version 2 only" license?
Yes, that follows quite clearly. People don't share your opinion, so resort to hysterically absurd arguments. That the GNU FDL is not DFSG-free tells us nothing about the DFSG-freeness of *any* other license. -- G. Branden Robinson | I suspect Linus wrote that in a Debian GNU/Linux | complicated way only to be able to [EMAIL PROTECTED] | have that comment in there. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Lars Wirzenius
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
