Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, 10 Oct 2003, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote: >> If you do not meet the requirements in the SEPL, for example if >> - you develop and distribute software which is sold for a fee higher than a >> reasonable copy charge >> - or/and you develop and distribute software which is not published under an >> Open Source or equivalent license >> you must purchase the Swiss Ephemeris Professional Edition under the Swiss >> Ephemeris Professional License. > > These clarifications are a bit troubling (and from my reading don't > extend from the license.) The licenses restriction of #1 only applies > to the source code of SE, not all of the compiled and source programs > distributed by a company as alluded to by #1. I'm not quite sure if > they intend for the license to actually mean #1, or if they just > weren't clear. > > #2 has the same problem of seeming to apply to all works distributed > by a person or entity, which isn't something delinated in the license. > [Eg, if you distribute any software which isn't under an OS license > (say you provide software under contract to someone) you need a > Professional License.]
Those are in what's essentially the "How to use this license" section, directed at those thinking of distributing their own independently developed software under the SEPL. I haven't looked closely at the data-transfer part. -Brian
