On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 04:41:32PM +0100, MJ Ray wrote: > On 2003-10-04 05:55:41 +0100 Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > >The reason I'm being so insistent on this topic, is once again the > >absurdity of not being able to identify an official Debian product > >with an > >official Debian logo. > > I may have misread this thread, but it sounds as if you are trying to > ignore that such an absurdity exists, rather than fix it. Please > consider raising this problem on debian-project, where the trademark > policy is being talked about and changing the logo licences would be > on-topic.
I agree. There seems to be a disconnect between the trademark conversation on -legal, the trademark conversation on -project, and the trademark conversation on spi-trademark. For my part, I will be forwarding these threads to the SPI trademark committee which has been talking with lawyers about some of these issues for a few months now (If this committee is news to you, don't worry, the discussion on -project two weeks ago made this very obvious and the DPL and I have been drafting a more public announcement about the committee which should be out in the next day or so). I agree with MJ that -project is the best place for this conversation in regards to Debian and the Debian logos. This is the thread on project that's perhaps the best place to start: http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2003/debian-project-200309/msg00004.html I posted a few follow-ups about the committee on project already for those that don't want to wait for the announcement: http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2003/debian-project-200309/msg00035.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2003/debian-project-200309/msg00045.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2003/debian-project-200309/msg00046.html Regards, Mako -- Benjamin Mako Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mako.yukidoke.org/
pgpA8uSfUgMUS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
