Hmm. Your mailer is honoring MFT, but not sending it: you CC'd Jaldhar, but didn't maintain him in the MFT. Might be a good thing to fix, so other people don't get blamed for CCing someone due to a third party dropping the header. :)
On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 05:16:54PM +0300, Richard Braakman wrote: > > People have asked "why isn't the official use logo DFSG-free?" on > > As far as I remember, the conclusion has always been "It should be; > we're inappropriately using copyrights to enforce a trademark restriction". > > We could instead leave the logo unencumbered by copyright, so that > people can derive their own logos from it, while enforcing our trademark, > so that people aren't allowed to use it to create confusion between > their work and ours. Thanks for the clarification. However, I'd wonder how a logo with a trademark-enforced restriction of "unauthorized projects only" or similar would be DFSG-free? I'd suppose it would fall under the "if you change this, change the name" allowances; "if you change this product, change the logo". I'm not sure if that's free, though. -- Glenn Maynard
